Hello , and welcome to Friday Coffee with MAP!

One of the most beautiful images nature offers us—evoked heavily in this week’s provocative piece—is a murmuration of starlings: a flock of hundreds of birds in flight, appearing as one amorphous, dancing formation in the sky. For reference, an image is here. In this week’s article, The New York Times’ David Brooks asks us to envision a similar movement in our brains—thoughts taking form in a way that mirrors a murmuration of starlings, sweeping across interconnected neurons and through different regions of the brain.

This constitutes a new and compelling understanding of how our brains function—and opens up fresh possibilities for how we understand our own thought processes, interpretations, and decision-making.

Happy reading!

What Are We Thinking?
_{by David Brooks for The New York Times}

____________________________________________________________________________

This piece explores recent updates in neuroscience, particularly new understandings of how the human brain processes both interior and exterior information—and what that can tell us about being human.

Brooks begins by defining the old understanding of brain function: the modular approach, which held that each brain region has its own specific job. We had long thought, for instance, that emotion was formed in the amygdala. New research suggests instead that specific brain processes do not have a specific anatomical home; that the brain is a network of interconnected regions, and that brain function moves across these regions like a flock of starlings through the sky.

Brooks argues that this interpretation of the brain’s activity better suits our reactivity to life’s astounding complexity. It allows us to see ourselves as ever-changing swirls of thoughts, fears, feelings, desires, impulses, memories, and bodily sensations that interact to form a single mind. Brooks goes on to call this “the mental swirl.”

This interpretation of the mind, Brooks argues, sits in direct conflict with many of our most relied-upon systems—notably the A, B, C letter-grading system used in most American schools—which force us into continuums that lack specificity and ultimately dehumanize us.

If you see people as a set of swirls, you are confronted with the fact that these different mental activities are intensely interconnected as part of a single, holistic process. The emotions you feel influence what you see just as much as what you see influences what you feel.

All too often, we are told to impose reason or calm onto our decision-making processes. The “mental swirl” view of the human mind challenges this, asking us to stop overvaluing reason and calm as superior emotions that should take precedence over all other signals our minds offer. Instead, it reminds us that emotions and desires should be weighed as equal parts of the whole mind—different resources people draw upon to help make judgments about what to do next.

Brooks ends the piece on an optimistic note, observing that modern neuroscience makes space for the “mental swirl” theory and opens new ways of understanding the processes that make us fully human—how we assign value, make decisions, improve ourselves, and move gracefully through life’s challenges.
____________________________________________________________________________

So tell us: How does the idea of human thought forming in a “mental swirl” change your view of your own decision-making and information intake?

Thank you,

The MAP Team

MAP Strategic Wealth Advisors | A Member of Advisory Services Network, LLC
10345 W. Olympic Blvd, Suite 110
Los Angeles, CA 90064
OFFICE: 310.601.4095
FAX: 310.388.5484
WEB: www.mapstrategic.com

This email contains links to articles or other information that may be on a third-party website. Advisory Services Network, LLC is not responsible for and does not control, adopt, or endorse any content contained on any third-party website.